There will be no further posts – unless Jon really makes headlines

Posted in Watching Jon on December 17, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

The election is long over, and the purpose of this blog has been fulfilled. This is the final post, unless Corzine really makes headlines or decides to run for another public office that puts New jersey taxpayers at risk.

However, Christie Watch is now in effect. I will be keeping up with Corzine’s machinations as he tries to derail Christie’s ability to effectively govern. Corzine is working full force to sabotage New Jersey government, appointing lackeys and allies into key positions. So please bookmark Christie Watch as we root for him to do the right thing.

Bye Jon

Posted in Watching Jon on November 6, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

BYE JON

And don’t let the door hit you in the ass!

NJ has 7 out of 10 highest property taxes in nation

Posted in Watching Jon on October 28, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

Bloomberg.com tells us what we already know:

The counties of Westchester, New York, and Hunterdon, New Jersey, charged the highest property tax bills in the U.S. during 2006-2008, the Tax Foundation said. All of the 10 top-paying counties were in the two states.

The median annual tax bill in Westchester, north of New York City, was $8,404 in the three-year period, the Washington, D.C.-based research organization said today in a study based on U.S. Census data. Hunterdon homeowners paid $8,347.

“In seven New Jersey counties and three New York counties, the median property tax over 2006-2008 is more than 7 percent of median household income, compared with the national median of 2.85 percent,” the study said.

Corzine promised to reduce property taxes. He raised our sales tax with the promise that it would be used to reduce property taxes. Neither happened.

Corzine hurts NJ fishermen

Posted in Watching Jon on October 28, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

Karrow: Corzine’s Quiet Diversion of Sea Life Protection Funds Threatens $42 Mln Industry

By Andrew Pratt

Senator Marcia Karrow, a member of the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee, said the Corzine administration has quietly taken $850, 356 from shellfish protection funds as the state’s budget crisis has worsened. The transfer of these dedicated funds was not authorized in the budget passed by the Legislature and threatens to shut down an industry that provides jobs well beyond the Jersey Shore, Karrow said.

“The diversions threaten to kill desperately needed jobs in the state’s $42 million shellfish harvesting industry during one of the worst recessions in history,” Karrow said. “This ill-conceived move was made by a governor who keeps trying to persuade the public that he job creation is his top priority.”

The Atlantic City Press has reported that some of the diverted funds are used to ensure that no shellfish are harvested from polluted areas. Without certification that harvested clams and oysters are not be taken from polluted areas, the federal Food and Drug Administration will not allow the sale New Jersey shellfish, fishermen say.

“The New Jersey shellfish industry generates $42 million in annual revenue for fishermen and estimated $250 million in economic benefits for the state,” Karrow said. “The Corzine administration should have never diverted this money, even if it did have the legal authority to do so without the Legislature’s approval.”

Karrow urged the treasurer to restore the money to the shellfish protection funds and to stop taking money that can’t be diverted without legislative approval.

“The governor can’t make up for his failed fiscal policies by ignoring the law,” Karrow said. The Atlantic City Press story is below:

Clam bed patrol loses New Jersey funds

By RICHARD DEGENER Staff Writer, 609-463-6711 | Posted: Thursday, September 17, 2009 |

 

Adam Banach, of Cape May, a mate on the Starlight, helps unload a load of surf clams from the boat at the docks off Rhode Island Avenue, in Atlantic City, Wednesday.

 

ATLANTIC CITY – New Jersey’s shell fishermen are concerned cutbacks in state funding for marine enforcement could jeopardize their ability to get their clams and oysters to market.

State Division of Fish and Game Director David Chanda told the state Marine Fisheries Council recently that his department’s shellfish program lost $850, 000 in funding for the fiscal year budget that began July 1.

Some of the that money would have funded the DEP’s patrols of clam beds. The Food and Drug Administration re quires the patrols; without them, the FDA may not approve the shipping of New Jersey shellfish to out-of state markets.

“It’s a grave concern for us right now. (DEP) Commissioner (Mark) Mauriello wasn’t able to stop it. We, like most everybody else in state government, are reacting to less resources, ” Chanda said Sept. 3.

The patrols cover back-bay areas to make sure shellfish are not taken from polluted waters. The FDA’s approvals for interstate shipping, however, would apply to all shellfish, including ocean clams and even Delaware Bay oysters that are taken from waters that carry no pollution concerns.

“The (state) treasurer’s office already came and took the money. It went to the general fund. We’re actively trying to get the funds reinstated, or at least get them back for the coming year, ” said Scot Mackey, a spokesman for the Garden State Seafood Association.

Most shellfish harvested in New Jersey, Mackey pointed out, are shipped out of state. Atlantic City’s ocean clamming industry, which harvested 35.3 million pounds of quahogs and surf clams last year worth more than $24 million, ships most of the product out of state for processing. The same is true at other clam docks in the state, including Point Pleasant and the port of Cape May-Wildwood.

The majority of the hard clams caught in the inland bays, an industry worth at least $8 million per year, and Delaware Bay oysters, a $3.6 million-per-year business, also are shipped across state lines.

Todd Reeves, of Harbor House Packing in Port Norris, Cumberland County, sends Delaware Bay oysters all over the country. Reeves said they couldn’t sell this year’s harvest, expected to be about 80, 000 bushels, just in New Jersey.

“It would be crippling to the whole industry. You might as well just pull the plug on this town, ” Reeves said.

The oyster boats here employ about 100 men, Reeves noted, and there are also jobs in the packing plants and loading docks.

“It’s a trickle down. The mechanic, the welder. There’s nothing else for people to do around here, ” Reeves said.

Mackey said the shellfish business is worth more than $42 million per year in New Jersey, and this is just the money paid to fishermen. He said the value is multiplied six times as the product is processed and other businesses cash in on the economic ripple effect of the industry.

“That’s $250 million as it goes through all the processors, canners, shippers and everybody, ” Mackey said.

The association is stressing that the money generates state tax revenue, including sales and income taxes.

State Sen. Jeff Van Drew, D-Cape May, Cumberland, Atlantic, said the state needs to protect fishing jobs and can’t allow tax revenues to be lost, which he noted is leading to “raiding of funds” from some programs to begin with.

“At a time of declining revenues we can’t allow policies to be implemented that reduce revenues further, ” said Van Drew.

Waters known to be polluted are broken down into low-, medium- and high-risk zones with the number of required patrols based on the risks. Darlene Yuhas, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Environmental Protection, said the state is currently meeting “the minimum basic level of compliance” for the patrols.

Assistant DEP Commissioner Amy Cradic said the FDA assesses the program every year and has pushed for more patrols. Cradic said in spite of the cuts the state would continue to meet the FDA requirements.

“These are tough budget times. We recognize the importance of the industry, and if we need to prioritize funding we will do what is necessary. We’re meeting the basic level of compliance and we meet annually with the FDA to make sure we are meeting that mandate, ” said Cradic.

FDA spokeswoman Stephanie Kwisnek said that if a state falls out of compliance, an action plan is worked out to meet the mandate. Kwisnek said taking away shellfish transportation approval is rare but she noted it would apply even to shellfish caught in other states but shipped through New Jersey. While it would apply to all clams and oysters, Kwisnek said with scallops it would only apply to those shippped in the shell or the roe of scallops. Sea scallops are the No. 1 catch in New Jersey but most are shucked at sea and only the meat is shipped. Kwisnek these would not fall under the program.

Chanda said the division’s inland programs might not be as hard hit because they have dedicated funding from hunting and freshwater fishing licenses. The marine programs do not have dedicated funding and those funds were cut.

“There’s obviously going to be an impact on our programs including habitat restoration, law enforcement and clamming work, ” Chanda said.

Ocean clams, including surf clams and ocean quahogs, used to be processed in New Jersey but other than one processing plant in Millville, Cumberland County, most are now shipped to factories in the south. The industry for years has blamed strict DEP requirements for driving clam-shucking plants out of state.

Hard clams, which are caught in the bays, are in demand at the New Jersey shore in the summer months, but most are shipped to New York, Philadelphia and other markets the rest of the year.

While all catches of ocean clams are logged, reporting requirements for bay hard clams are not as strict; a 2000 study indicated that the $8 million-per-year industry is underreported by at least half.
Web: www.senatenj.com Twitter: twitter.com/senatenj  YouTube: youtube.com/senatenj  Facebook: facebook.com/senatenj

My best friend

Posted in Watching Jon on October 25, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

Jon Corzine and Joe Ferriero, convicted felon. Corzine (and his mother from Illinois) donated thousands upon thousands to this criminal.

Jon Corzine just has plain bad judgment.

Corzine the enabler

Posted in Watching Jon on October 25, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

Courier Post goes for Christie

Posted in Watching Jon on October 25, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

The Courier Post endorsed Christie for Governor.

Last year, the nation needed change in Washington, and got it.

This year, New Jersey desperately needs a change in Trenton.

The 2009 gubernatorial race represents the best chance New Jersey has had in years to break the suffocating, one-party stranglehold the Democratic Party has had in Trenton for six years now. In their time controlling the Legislature and the governor’s office, the Democrats have thrown the door wide open to bigger government, constantly rising taxes and a public payroll gone out of control.

Asbury Park Press – Vote for Christie

Posted in Watching Jon on October 25, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

The Asbury Park Press demands that we make New Jersey once again affordable for the middle class, and they say Christie is the man to do that!

Cut taxes and reduce government spending. Make New Jersey affordable again for the middle class. Enact ethics reforms that will discourage political corruption and help restore the public’s faith in their elected officials.

While the mainstream press is reluctant to call Corzine corrupt, the fact is that he has turned a blind eye as his political cohorts, men that he supported and endorsed, have been lead off in handcuffs left and right. This in itself should be cause for concern. In New Jersey, if you are a business the ONLY way to get a government contract is to donate heavily to political campaigns.

For the most part, Gov. Jon Corzine and the Legislature have stood on their hands. Corzine’s halfway measures on everything from curbing spending and borrowing, ending the excesses of the public employee unions and implementing reforms aimed at transforming the culture of corruption and self-serving decision-making in New Jersey have fallen far short of what is required to put New Jersey back on track.

Corzine’s ethics reform was so full of holes that it has hardly been a bump in the road for pay-to-play. Corzine’s budget relied too heavily on postponing debt, leaving us with an $8 BILLION (yes, that is Billion with a “B”) deficit in 2010 before we even welcome in the new year.

The Press does acknowledge some disturbing facts about Christie:

Christie has run a disappointing campaign. He has made himself vulnerable on a number of ethics-related issues.

This information is disappointing, but does not even come close to the ethics lapses of our governor. Christie’s driving record? At least he didn’t have his state police driver break the law and crash a state vehicle recklessly, and at the same time refuse to wear a seat-belt. A loan to someone he worked with? That loan was less than 10% of the loan that Corzine gave to a union leader, and then proceeded to continually favor the unions in negotiations, driving up New Jersey debt and making no concessions that favor the taxpayers. Corzine’s loan is much more disturbing to this taxpayer.

Much more disturbing to this taxpayer is Corzine’s record so far:

New Jersey continues to have the highest property taxes, second-highest sales tax rate and third-highest top income rate in the nation. Corzine increased the sales tax from 6 cents to 7 cents, raised the top income tax rate to 10.67 percent, increased tolls on the Garden State Parkway and New Jersey Turnpike and watched as the state’s unfunded liabilities — pensions, health care and debt — continued to soar.

One might be convinced that Daggett is a viable alternative. Unfortunately, he will be a spoiler in this election. He has no way of winning, bar a miracle or massive voter fraud that is typical of Democrats, and of which he does not have the resources to perpetrate!

Daggett has no realistic plan, and his ideas would be worse than Corzine’s. In fact, the only people to benefit under Daggett woould be those with incomes above $125,000.

Daggett wants to eliminate all of the existing property tax relief programs, including Homestead Rebates. For most homeowners, the plan would provide little or no net tax relief. The primary beneficiaries of the plan, an analysis by Assemblyman Samuel Thompson, R-Monmouth, found, would be those with incomes of more than $125,000. Daggett also supports an increase in the gasoline tax and putting tolls on highways now without them. He also sees no value in pushing for consolidation of schools and municipalities, and opposes giving citizens the right to put questions on the ballot through initiative and referendum.

My worst fear is that this Christie would be like a former republican Christie – I voted for Whitman with hopes that she would bring much needed reform to this state. She failed miserably, setting the standard for future governors to defer pension payments and helping to create this fiscal mess we are in.

However, we KNOW what Corzine is going to do. Can we afford another four years? I don’t think so. Corzine has shown that he is not a leader. Corzine has proven that he is too willing to cave in to special interests and cater to the unions, while New Jersey boasts some of the highest unemployment rates int he union.

Corzine’s advice to you if you want a job? “Move to Nebraska!” That’s right. He could care less that you are struggling, and would prefer that the whining working class, struggling to pay mortgages and find a job move out of state. His treasurer said, with a straight face, that New Jersey residents are NOT overtaxed. Hopelessly out of touch, maybe it is time to see Corzine in the unemployment line this fall!

Press of Atlantic City Endorses Christie

Posted in Watching Jon on October 25, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

The Press endorsed Christie for Governor. In a well-written editorial, they raised the same concerns that I have, such as loosening spending limits on government travel (we should be tightening and adding more restrictions on the use of taxpayer money)…

Christie is not without flaws. We are troubled by his cavalier attitude regarding reimbursement limits on government travel expenses, as well as the appearance of political posturing while he served as U.S. Attorney. Still, these ethical questions – hammered home by the moneyed Corzine campaign – do not outweigh qualities that make him the right person to fix what’s wrong in Trenton.

However, the Press came out strongly against Corzine’s deplorable record and inability to keep even one campaign promise.

We endorsed Corzine during the last race, but his term has been a disappointment. He has been less than effective in dealing with the Legislature. He has strived, too weakly at times, for fiscal prudence…

They had words that were way too kind for Daggett, but at least conceded that he is too much of a long shot to be anything but a spoiler for Christie. Daggett is making the same promise to raise taxes that Corzine did. Corzine raised our sales tax promising that it would be used to offset property taxes. If your property taxes decreased under Corzine, then by all means, vote for him.

Daggett would raise sales taxes, but has absolutely no plan to reduce property taxes – just like Corzine. New Jersey CANNOT tax itself into prosperity!

Corzine’s Plan – tax New Jersey out of recession

Posted in Watching Jon on October 23, 2009 by Eyes Everywhere

In last night’s debate, Jon Corzine promised to lead New Jersey out of the recession with his ideas. Of course we know his ideas – taxes upon taxes. Jon has promised to tax New Jersey into prosperity. Of course the only New Jersyans getting prosperous will be union leaders and politicians.